COLLEGE FOOTBALL POWER RATINGS
NCAA FOOTBALL POWER RATINGS
College Football Power Ratings are a numerical value of relative strength of teams
based on a performance, changes in personnel, coaching, schedule strength and current form. College Football
Power Ratings are statistical and historical ratings and do not take into account emotional factors. College
football power ratings are purely objective and a deadly weapon in any handicapper's arsenal. No emotion or bias is
involved. College football power ratings must be updated weekly or they become skewed and stale. Our college
football power ratings allow us to judge pretty accurately the relative strengths of teams in any given matchup.
College football power ratings are an exceptional handicapping tool and should be utilized with many other
handicapping tools such as trend, statistical and fundamental analysis. Our aim is to obtain winners via college
football power ratings and using other handicapping methodology to confirm, adjust and predict a point spread to
compare against the Las Vegas odds.
To make point spread predictions for scheduled upcoming games, simply compare the college football powers
ratings. The higher the PR the stronger the team. For example, if a home team is a 66 playing a 56,
then the home team is 10 points stronger. Then add 3 points to the home team, this makes them 13
points stronger. We update our college football power ratings after each weeks games.
College Football Power Ratings Updated Thursday
12/22/11
|
TEAM
|
PR
|
|
AIR FORCE
|
38
|
|
AKRON
|
7
|
|
ALABAMA
|
67
|
|
ARIZONA
|
36
|
|
ARIZONA ST
|
46
|
|
ARKANSAS
|
57
|
|
ARKANSAS ST
|
32
|
|
ARMY
|
30
|
|
AUBURN
|
42
|
|
BALL ST
|
24
|
|
BAYLOR
|
49
|
|
BOISE ST
|
57
|
|
BOSTON COLLEGE
|
33
|
|
BOWLING GREEN
|
22
|
|
BUFFALO
|
17
|
|
BYU
|
44
|
|
C MICHIGAN
|
21
|
|
CALIFORNIA
|
46
|
|
CINCINNATI
|
44
|
|
CLEMSON
|
45
|
|
COLORADO
|
31
|
|
COLORADO ST
|
18
|
|
CONNECTICUT
|
37
|
|
DUKE
|
28
|
|
E CAROLINA
|
27
|
|
E MICHIGAN
|
16
|
|
FLA ATLANTIC
|
10
|
|
FLA INTERNATIONAL
|
30
|
|
FLORIDA
|
45
|
|
FLORIDA ST
|
53
|
|
FRESNO ST
|
26
|
|
GEORGIA
|
52
|
|
GEORGIA TECH
|
44
|
|
HAWAII
|
33
|
|
HOUSTON
|
52
|
|
IDAHO
|
22
|
|
ILLINOIS
|
40
|
|
INDIANA
|
23
|
|
IOWA
|
40
|
|
IOWA ST
|
32
|
|
KANSAS
|
24
|
|
KANSAS ST
|
46
|
|
KENT ST
|
25
|
|
KENTUCKY
|
28
|
|
LA LAFAYETTE
|
27
|
|
LA MONROE
|
26
|
|
LOUISIANA TECH
|
36
|
|
LOUISVILLE
|
37
|
|
LSU
|
69
|
|
MARSHALL
|
27
|
|
MARYLAND
|
32
|
|
MEMPHIS
|
11
|
|
MIAMI
|
46
|
|
MIAMI OHIO
|
31
|
|
MICHIGAN
|
48
|
|
MICHIGAN ST
|
50
|
|
MIDDLE TENN ST
|
18
|
|
MINNESOTA
|
24
|
|
MISSISSIPPI ST
|
45
|
|
MISSOURI
|
50
|
|
N CAROLINA
|
41
|
|
N ILLINOIS
|
39
|
|
NAVY
|
34
|
|
NC STATE
|
39
|
|
NEBRASKA
|
44
|
|
NEVADA
|
41
|
|
NEW MEXICO
|
6
|
|
NEW MEXICO ST
|
18
|
|
NORTH TEXAS
|
22
|
|
NORTHWESTERN
|
37
|
|
NOTRE DAME
|
48
|
|
OHIO ST
|
45
|
|
OHIO U
|
30
|
|
OKLAHOMA
|
56
|
|
OKLAHOMA ST
|
64
|
|
OLE MISS
|
28
|
|
OREGON
|
63
|
|
OREGON ST
|
36
|
|
PENN ST
|
41
|
|
PITTSBURGH
|
40
|
|
PURDUE
|
34
|
|
RICE
|
22
|
|
RUTGERS
|
38
|
|
S CAROLINA
|
49
|
|
S FLORIDA
|
43
|
|
SAN DIEGO ST
|
35
|
|
SAN JOSE ST
|
23
|
|
SMU
|
33
|
|
SOUTHERN MISS
|
45
|
|
STANFORD
|
62
|
|
SYRACUSE
|
32
|
|
TCU
|
51
|
|
TEMPLE
|
36
|
|
TENNESSEE
|
38
|
|
TEXAS
|
46
|
|
TEXAS A&M
|
52
|
|
TEXAS TECH
|
36
|
|
TOLEDO
|
37
|
|
TROY
|
22
|
|
TULANE
|
7
|
|
TULSA
|
45
|
|
UAB
|
18
|
|
UCF
|
40
|
|
UCLA
|
34
|
|
UNLV
|
13
|
|
USC
|
58
|
|
UTAH
|
44
|
|
UTAH ST
|
29
|
|
UTEP
|
28
|
|
VANDERBILT
|
39
|
|
VIRGINIA
|
37
|
|
VIRGINIA TECH
|
48
|
|
W KENTUCKY
|
24
|
|
W MICHIGAN
|
33
|
|
W VIRGINIA
|
45
|
|
WAKE FOREST
|
35
|
|
WASHINGTON
|
42
|
|
WASHINGTON ST
|
35
|
|
WISCONSIN
|
64
|
|
WYOMING
|
31
|
college football power ratings - ncaa football power ratings
|